Artificial intelligence (AI) has become part of human’s lifestyle, with the technology gaining tract and advancements. The most trending and contradictory aspect of AI has been the deepfake technology advanced by the everchanging algorithms. In recent years, this technology has evolved from a niche experiment into a global concern, raising critical questions about the ethics of digital manipulation and the extent of its application. With the ability to create hyper-realistic but entirely synthetic audio, video, and images, deepfake technology has not only attracted the attention of tech enthusiasts but created debates among policymakers, ethicists, and international organizations.
Even though we appreciate the technological advancements like the deepfake, where do we draw the line?
On one hand, deepfakes are cheered for their potential in the creative arts, education, and entertainment industries. They offer innovative ways to create content, replicate historical moments, or even restore lost works of art. However, as with many advanced technologies, the same flair that allows for positive uses also open the door to darker applications-political manipulation, defamation, misinformation and disinformation, cyberbullying, and even large-scale fraud. For instance, in a recent meeting by the International Government Communication Forum (ICGF), global leaders expressed concerns over how deepfakes are being used inappropriately. These synthetic media creations have been used to distort public perception by impersonating leaders or events that escalate tensions. This is evident according to a broadcast by Emmanuel Too, where he mentioned that:
“The challenge of AI is affected politics in the US, which are expected in just about a month, forcing the US Federal Communication commission to outlaw Robocalls that contain AI generated voices citing their capacity to misinform voters”
The ethical question, then, is clear: where does the line between creative freedom and harmful deception blur?
In response to these concerns, different nations have taken initiatives to regulate the use of Artificial intelligence, The European AI Act proposed regulations on the use of AI. In Kenya, the government has initiated efforts to address threats posed by advancements in technological advancements that incorporate the use of AI. President William Ruto, during a recent address at the United Nations General Assembly, emphasized on the steps taken by the government.
“We have just finished the policy and I’m happy to report here that the Parliament is now seized with the necessary legislation and guideline that will support our AI Journey.”
It is true that the government is working with digital experts to establish ethical standards and regulations. However, enforcement remains a significant challenge. This opens-up a central dialogue: Can regulations keep pace with the rapid advancements in AI technology, or will we constantly be one step behind unethical perpetrators?
While regulatory frameworks are important, the ethical responsibility of developers and users of deepfake technology cannot be exaggerated. A growing number of AI experts argue that self-regulation, the ability of the users to understand how to detect deepfakes and make rational decisions within the tech advancing environment, supplemented by adaptive ethical guidelines, will help address the existing threats.
Kenya’s unique position as a promising tech hub makes it vital for the country to strike a balance between promoting technological innovations and safeguarding the public from harm. Deepfake technology presents both opportunities and threats, which we should not be afraid of, but fully incorporate the measures that will increase our position in the tech space. Experts from the ICGF suggested that nations should cooperate to create international guidelines for responsible AI use. This would mirror existing frameworks on technology and cybercrime, ensuring that the ethical use of AI becomes a global priority. However, given the differing levels of technological development and governance across countries, achieving this consensus will be slow and uneven process.
The genuineness of the deepfake debate is a question that challenges our values: How are we willing to sacrifice in pursuit of digital convenience and creativity? Will we prioritize transparency and truth in the face of a technology that blurs reality? Therefore, what measures will global and local actors take to protect the public without stifling innovation?
As deepfake technology continues to advance, the ethical line will need constant redefinition. Policymakers will have to stay vigilant, ensuring that legislation evolves alongside the technology. Meanwhile, as individuals, we must become more analytical of the digital content we consume, recognizing that the ethical use of technology is as much a social responsibility as a legal one. The future of deepfake is uncertain, but one thing is clear: where we draw the line today will shape the digital space of tomorrow. The question now is-are we ready for that responsibility?
Discussions
Login to Post Comments